
Fairfax County DWI Checkpoint Nets Only 1 DWI Arrest
Posted on 9/5/2010
Fairfax County DWI Checkpoint Nets Only 1 DWI Arrest
Posted on 9/5/2010
Suspect Grabs Officer's Taser and Shoots Him with It
Posted on 8/18/2010
Five Arrests from Recent Sobriety Checkpoint
Posted on 8/17/2010
Medical Marijuana May be Traveling Through an Airport Near You!
Posted on 8/14/2010
Virginia ASAP Program Regulations - Chapter 20
Chapter 40 of Virginia ASAP Program Regulations
Chapter 30 of Virginia ASAP Program Regulations
Chapter 60 of Virginia ASAP Program Regulations
My 5 Favorite Ways to win a DWI case in Fairfax County--Combine 2 or more and We are Well on Our Way
Virginia Highway Safety Corridors
Virginia Highway Safety Corridor Brochure
Fairfax County Reckless Speeding Lawyer Paul McGlone Recommends this Article from The Baltimore Sun, Discussing the Strict Enforcement of High Speed Cases in Northern Virginia
Local Fairfax Marijuana Defense Attorney Paul McGlone says these are the crucial regulations for Virginia Marijuana Field Tests that any Virginia Marijuana Defense Attorney should be familiar with. If you have any questions regarding a Marijuana Charge, please contact Paul McGlone at 703-273-2750 or 1-888-273-2750.
Fairfax County Marijuana Defense Attorney Paul Liam McGlone agrees with writer and forensic drug expert John Kelly, who explains in this enlightening report that many marijuana lab tests result in false positives and calls for more oversight of these tests.
Beware of Virginia Marijuana 251 Dismissal
DWI Roadblock Guidelines from the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police
This Fairfax County Police Roadblock, from Springfield, VA in 2008 looks like a Tijuana Border Crossing. Gestapo Germany never had such resources!
Mall Cops -- The Real Story, Here in Fairfax County
This Citizen Did Not Want to Serve on a Montana Jury
History of Virginia State Police
Photograph of George Washington's Will
Virginia DUI/DWI Attorney | Traffic Violations | Criminal Defense | Marijuana Defense | DWI with Refusal | DWI Checkpoints |
§ 19.2-187.1. Procedures for notifying accused of certificate of analysis; waiver; continuances.
The accused in any hearing or trial in which a certificate of analysis is admitted into evidence pursuant to § 19.2-187 or § 19.2-187.01 shall have the right to call the person performing such analysis or examination or involved in the chain of custody as a witness therein, and examine him in the same manner as if he had been called as an adverse witness. Such witness shall be summoned and appear at the cost of the Commonwealth.
A. In any trial and in any hearing other than a preliminary hearing, in which the attorney for the Commonwealth intends to offer a certificate of analysis into evidence pursuant to § 19.2-187, the attorney for the Commonwealth shall:
1. Provide by mail, delivery, or otherwise, a copy of the certificate to counsel of record for the accused, or to the accused if he is proceeding pro se, at no charge, no later than 28 days prior to the hearing or trial;
2. Attach to the copy of the certificate so provided under subdivision 1 a notice to the accused of his right to object to having the certificate admitted without the person who performed the analysis or examination being present and testifying; and
3. File a copy of the certificate and notice with the clerk of the court hearing the matter on the day that the certificate and notice are provided to the accused.
B. The accused may object in writing to admission of the certificate of analysis, in lieu of testimony, as evidence of the facts stated therein and of the results of the analysis or examination. Such objection shall be filed with the court hearing the matter, with a copy to the attorney for the Commonwealth, no more than 14 days after the certificate and notice were filed with the clerk by the attorney for the Commonwealth or the objection shall be deemed waived. If timely objection is made, the certificate shall not be admissible into evidence unless (i) the testimony of the person who performed the analysis or examination is admitted into evidence describing the facts and results of the analysis or examination during the Commonwealth's case-in-chief at the hearing or trial and that person is present and subject to cross-examination by the accused, (ii) the objection is waived by the accused or his counsel in writing or before the court, or (iii) the parties stipulate before the court to the admissibility of the certificate.
C. Where the person who performed the analysis and examination is not available for hearing or trial and the attorney for the Commonwealth has used due diligence to secure the presence of the person, the court shall order a continuance. Any continuances ordered pursuant to this subsection shall total not more than 90 days if the accused has been held continuously in custody and not more than 180 days if the accused has not been held continuously in custody.
D. Any objection by counsel for the accused, or the accused if he is proceeding pro se, to timeliness of the receipt of notice required by subsection A shall be made before hearing or trial upon his receipt of actual notice unless the accused did not receive actual notice prior to hearing or trial. A showing by the Commonwealth that the notice was mailed, delivered, or otherwise provided in compliance with the time requirements of this section shall constitute prima facie evidence that the notice was timely received by the accused. If the court finds upon the accused's objection made pursuant to this subsection, that he did not receive timely notice pursuant to subsection A, the accused's objection shall not be deemed waived and if the objection is made prior to hearing or trial, a continuance shall be ordered if requested by either party. Any continuance ordered pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to the time limitations set forth in subsection C.
E. The accused in any hearing or trial in which a certificate of analysis is offered into evidence shall have the right to call the person performing such analysis or examination or involved in the chain of custody as a witness therein, and examine him in the same manner as if he had been called as an adverse witness. Such witness shall be summoned and appear at the cost of the Commonwealth.
This is the information that you have provided on the News Article:
Category: Celebrity DUI and DWI
Name: Charles Barkley DWI-- Charles is Innocent!From the Desk of Fairfax Virginia DUI Attorney Paul McGlone, December 31, 2008:
The National News Media has jumped on the Charles Barkley story overnight. However, their story Misses one key ingredient:
Reportedly, Former NBA Star Charles Barkley was arrested in Scottsdale, Arizona on suspicion of Driving While Intoxicated. Media reports say that Charles Barkley ran a stop sign, had alcohol on his breath, and failed "Standard Field Sobriety Tests".
What nobody seems to mention, but it is obvious to any Criminal Defense Attorney, is that Charles Barkley is Innocent of these charges! Constitution of the United States does not cite it explicitly, presumption of innocence is widely held to follow from the 5th, 6th and 14th amendments.
Charles Barkley and every other citizen-- every PERSON, in fact-- accused of a criminal act in the United States, is Presumed to be Innocent at every stage of the proceeding until such time as he is found guilty of the offense by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Furthermore, According to Fairfax Virginia DUI Attorney Paul McGlone, the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests are not deemed to be valid for a person who is more than a certain amount above the ideal weight for their age and height. Barkley is 45 years old, and played with a listed Height of 6' 6", but lately he is well above his listed playing weight of 252. If he is over 300 pounds, the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
There is no breath test, and we really won't know much about whether Mr. Barkley is likely to be convicted of this charge until the results of the Blood test are revealed. Hopefully, Mr. Barkley will hire one of the top Arizona DUI Attorneys, like James Nesci or Ed Loss.
Paul McGlone
pmcglone@mcglonelaw.com
www.McGloneLaw.com
McGlone Law Firm, P.C.
10513 Judicial Drive
Suite 201
Fairfax, VA 22030
Phone: (703) 273-2750
Fax: (703) 591-0258
Toll Free: (888) 273-2750
Get Directions
Drunk-Driving Wisconsin Woman Calls 911
NY Cop Charged with DWI after Crashing into Tiffany's
DUI Suspect Won't Budge - Police Keep Trying
Virginia's "Move Over" Law Public Service Announcement
Virginia's Move Over Law - 5 Troopers Struck in February
Unlocking Traffic Speed Cameras
East Coast Rapist - AP News Report
CNN News Story - 7 Year-Old Girl Killed by Detroit Police
Pittsburgh Steelers Quarterback Accused of Sexual Assault - Again
AZ Minister Tazered and Beaten by Police at Checkpoint
Paul McGlone receives signed jersey from Capitals' Tomas Fleischmann